Visual polish and layout adjustments to the career constellation chart, sidebar, and repeat medications section. 12 discrete changes across 10 files.
Refactor the portfolio codebase to eliminate duplication, consolidate data sources, extract shared utilities, and simplify components — while preserving identical runtime behaviour and visual output.
## Requirements
## Guiding Principle
### 1. Reduce link opacity (`src/components/constellation/constants.ts`)
- Lower `LINK_BASE_OPACITY` from `0.08` → `0.04`
- Lower `LINK_STRENGTH_OPACITY_FACTOR` from `0.12` → `0.06`
- Makes skill connection lines subtler so job pills are visually clearer
**Single Source of Truth**: Every piece of information should live in exactly one place. Derived data is fine (for code-splitting/performance), but the canonical definition must not be duplicated.
- Starting phase in App.tsx: `useState<Phase>('boot')` (line 48)
**Objective:** Audit all user-facing text against reference documents, fix inaccuracies, remove ECG phase, redesign boot transition.
### Current state
Fresh start. No checklist items completed yet. The plan.md file contains leftover content from a previous objective (profile-content rollout). Will overwrite with new plan.
**Approach:**
- Phase 0: Quick dev shortcut to bypass boot for faster iteration
- Phase 1: Merge secondary references into single deduplicated doc
- Phase 2: Audit each data file against references (11 sub-tasks)
Created `References/andy_charlwood_complete_reference.md` — 518-line deduplicated merge of both secondary sources. Structured by: career timeline (McDonald's → Paydens → Tesco → NHS ICB), key projects (11 detailed), high-cost drug pathways, technical skills, leadership style, stakeholder engagement, career transition strategy, education, personal interests, and quick-reference metrics table.
### Plan for Phase 1.1
-Task: task-1771291778-077f — Migrate medications.ts prescribingHistory into skills.ts
-medications.ts is dead code (zero imports) but contains rich prescribingHistory data
-Need to: merge data into skills.ts, update SkillMedication type, delete medications.ts
-Delegating to Refactor Planner via work.start to analyse and produce a detailed plan
Key merge decisions:
-Career knowledge dump had more detail on Paydens, McDonald's, Tesco learning journey, AI/LLM work, polypharmacy dashboard, ICB merger, daily work breakdown, speaking engagements — all included
-Career knowledge had cleaner narrative structure for projects and stakeholder engagement — used as skeleton
-Where metrics conflicted (e.g. £2.8M vs £2.6M savings), included both with context (£2.8M max potential, refined to £2.6M)
-Preserved all quotes from knowledge dump (philosophy section)
## 2026-02-17 — Iteration 4: Build Phase 1.1
Commit: 9e31843. This unblocks all Phase 2 audit tasks (2.1–2.10).
### Analysis
- medications.ts had 18 entries (262 lines), skills.ts had 21 entries (240 lines)
- ID mapping: 17 of 18 medication entries matched skills (med-dashboard had no match — Dashboard Development is subsumed by Power BI)
- 3 skills had no medication counterpart: excel, change-management, financial-modelling, executive-comms — they don't get prescribingHistory
## Iteration 3 — ALL PHASES COMPLETE
### Changes made
1.`src/types/pmr.ts`: Added `prescribingHistory?: PrescribingHistoryEntry[]` to `SkillMedication` interface
2.`src/types/pmr.ts`: Removed dead `Medication` interface (was only used by medications.ts)
3.`src/data/skills.ts`: Added prescribingHistory arrays to 17 matching skill entries
4. Deleted `src/data/medications.ts`
Completed all remaining 16 tasks in a single iteration:
### Verification
-lint: pass (0 errors, 5 pre-existing warnings)
- typecheck: pass (clean)
-build: pass (4.13s)
-No broken imports (medications.ts had zero consumers)
1.`src/data/timeline.ts`: Inlined all narrative data (description, details, outcomes, codedEntries) directly into each TimelineEntity object; removed import of `getTimelineNarrativeEntry`
3.`src/lib/profile-content.ts`: Removed `getTimelineNarrativeEntry()` function and its type imports (`TimelineNarrativeId`, `TimelineNarrativeEntry`)
4.`src/types/profile-content.ts`: Removed `TimelineNarrativeCodeEntry`, `TimelineNarrativeEntry`, `TimelineNarrativeId` types and `timelineNarrative` field from `ProfileContent` interface
### Verification
- lint: pass (0 errors, 5 pre-existing warnings)
- typecheck: pass (clean)
- build: pass (4.41s)
- All narrative data preserved — identical runtime output
The objective says to split profile-content.ts into focused concerns:
- LLM system prompt → inline into llm.ts or dedicated file
- Education narrative → merge into documents.ts or educationExtras.ts
- Keep only genuinely unique content in profile-content.ts
However, looking at the current state, profile-content.ts is a cohesive text/copy store (246 lines) with clear structure and typed accessors. The LLM prompt is the largest chunk (~110 lines) and is the best candidate for extraction. The education entries and achievements are compact and well-organized.
Delegating to Refactor Planner to analyse and produce detailed plan for this phase.
## 2026-02-17 — Iteration 7: Planning Phase 1.3
### Analysis
After Phase 1.2, profile-content.ts is 246 lines with 5 sections. The LLM systemPrompt (~110 lines) is the dominant chunk with a single consumer (llm.ts). Education entries carry `keywords` not present in documents.ts, so merging would bloat Document type. Achievement entries are compact and unique.
### Decision
Extract LLM prompt only → new `src/data/llm-prompt.ts`. Keep education, achievements, quick actions, and UI labels in profile-content.ts as a cohesive "UI copy and search metadata" store.
### Changes planned
1. Create `src/data/llm-prompt.ts` with `LLM_SYSTEM_PROMPT` const
2. Remove `searchChat.llm` from `src/data/profile-content.ts`
3. Remove `LLMCopy` from types and `getLLMCopy()` from accessors
4. Update `src/lib/llm.ts` to import directly from `@/data/llm-prompt`
5. Result: profile-content.ts drops from ~246 to ~135 lines
Plan written to .ralph/plan.md. Emitting plan.ready.
## 2026-02-17 — Iteration 8: Build Phase 1.3
### Changes made
1. Created `src/data/llm-prompt.ts` — exported `LLM_SYSTEM_PROMPT` const (110 lines)
2.`src/data/profile-content.ts` — removed entire `llm` property from `searchChat` section (246 → 133 lines, net -113 lines)
3.`src/types/profile-content.ts` — removed `LLMCopy` interface, removed `llm` field from `searchChat` in `ProfileContent`
4.`src/lib/profile-content.ts` — removed `getLLMCopy()` function and `LLMCopy` import
5.`src/lib/llm.ts` — import changed from `getLLMCopy` to direct `LLM_SYSTEM_PROMPT` import; `buildSystemPrompt()` returns the const directly
### Verification
- lint: pass (0 errors, 5 pre-existing warnings)
- typecheck: pass (clean)
- build: pass (6.44s)
- No remaining references to `getLLMCopy` or `LLMCopy` anywhere in src/
-`buildSystemPrompt()` returns identical string at runtime
- Added clarifying comment to `src/data/tags.ts` (data derivation separated from UI)
- Both files kept as-is — justified indirection layers
### Phase 2.1 — Utility extraction
1.`src/lib/utils.ts`: Added `hexToRgba()` function and `prefersReducedMotion` const
2.`src/components/DashboardLayout.tsx`: Removed local `hexToRgba` (6 lines) + `prefersReducedMotion` (1 line), added import from `@/lib/utils`
3.`src/components/WorkExperienceSubsection.tsx`: Removed local `hexToRgba` (6 lines) + `prefersReducedMotion` (1 line), added import from `@/lib/utils`
4.`src/components/TimelineInterventionsSubsection.tsx`: Removed local `hexToRgba` (6 lines) + `prefersReducedMotion` (1 line), added import from `@/lib/utils`
5.`src/components/CommandPalette.tsx`: Removed local `prefersReducedMotion` (1 line), added import from `@/lib/utils`
6.`src/components/ChatWidget.tsx`: Removed local `prefersReducedMotion` (1 line), added import from `@/lib/utils`
7.`src/components/constellation/constants.ts`: Replaced local `prefersReducedMotion` with re-export from `@/lib/utils` (preserves 5 existing `./constants` importers)
### Verification
-`hexToRgba` defined in exactly 1 file: `src/lib/utils.ts`
-`prefersReducedMotion` module-level const in exactly 1 file: `src/lib/utils.ts` (ProjectsTile uses intentionally different useState+effect pattern)
- lint: pass (0 errors, 5 pre-existing warnings)
- typecheck: pass (clean)
- build: pass (4.23s)
- Net lines removed: ~26 (3×7 hexToRgba + 5×1 prefersReducedMotion - 8 new import lines + 9 new lines in utils.ts)
-`ProjectsTile.tsx` vs `ProjectDetail.tsx`: **INCONSISTENT** — `Ongoing` is `#0D6E6E` in tile but `#D97706` in detail; `Live` is `#059669` in tile but `#0D6E6E` in detail
- Note: index.css also defines `--amber`, `--alert`, `--purple` CSS vars
#### 2. DEFAULT ORG COLOR FALLBACK — 9 occurrences (MEDIUM)
-`consultation.orgColor ?? '#0D6E6E'` repeated 6 times in WorkExperienceSubsection and 3 times in DashboardLayout
- Already partly in CSS vars (`--shadow-sm`, `--shadow-md`, `--shadow-lg`)
- Some inline JS usages can't easily use CSS vars (D3 flood-color, dynamic hover)
- Worth extracting base color `26,43,42` as a constant but low ROI for a function since opacities vary and most are unique contexts
#### 5. BREAKPOINT CHECKS — border case (3 for 640, 2 for 768) (LOW)
-`window.innerWidth < 640` in 3 files (useForceSimulation, AccessibleNodeOverlay, CareerConstellation)
- These are inside different contexts (hooks, components, D3) — extracting a constant is simple but extracting a function adds minimal value since the comparison is trivially clear
- Breakpoint values already in tailwind.config.js and CLAUDE.md
- Three subsection components (WorkExperienceSubsection ~306 lines, TimelineInterventionsSubsection ~346 lines, RepeatMedicationsSubsection ~294 lines) all implement expand/collapse card patterns
- Need to analyse the shared pattern: expand/collapse toggle, animation, consistent styling
- Each subsection keeps unique content rendering via children/render props
- Delegating to Refactor Planner via work.start to analyse and produce detailed plan
## 2026-02-17 — Iteration 16: Planning Phase 3.1
### Critical finding
RepeatMedicationsSubsection does NOT have an expand/collapse pattern. `SkillRow` is a flat clickable row — no AnimatePresence, no isExpanded, no height animation. Only WorkExperienceSubsection and TimelineInterventionsSubsection share the expandable card pattern.
### Shared pattern (WorkExperience RoleItem vs Timeline TimelineInterventionItem)
Both implement:
1. Container with border highlight + hover effects
2. Header button with role="button", tabIndex, Enter/Space/Escape keyboard handling
3. Org color dot (9px)
4. ChevronRight with 90deg rotation on expand
5. AnimatePresence height 0→auto→0 with motionSafeTransition(0.2)
6. Expanded content with borderTop, borderLeft using orgColor
- Header layout: Work stacks role/org/duration; Timeline has pill label + title/org+date
- Data fields: consultation.* vs entity.*
- Timeline has className and data-tile-id attributes
- Timeline has optional codedEntries guard
### Decision
Extract `ExpandableCardShell` component with render props for header and body content. This captures the structural expand/collapse interaction pattern (~50 lines duplicated in each consumer) into a single source of truth. Each consumer keeps its unique content rendering.
Plan written to .ralph/plan.md. Emitting plan.ready.
## 2026-02-17 — Iteration 17: Build Phase 3.1
### Changes made
1. Created `src/components/ExpandableCardShell.tsx` (147 lines) — shared expand/collapse card shell:
- Container with highlight/expanded border styling + hover effects
- Header button with role="button", tabIndex, keyboard handler (Enter/Space/Escape)
- Org color dot (9px circle)
- ChevronRight with 90deg rotation
- AnimatePresence height 0→auto→0 with motionSafeTransition(0.2)
- Expanded content wrapper with borderTop, borderLeft, padding
The 6 detail components are **content-only** renderers — they don't individually handle container, close button, scroll, or animation. They receive their data as props and render inside the DetailPanel body.
**Shared style patterns across the 6 detail components:**
**EducationDetail already extracts sectionHeaderStyle as a const** — the other 5 components inline it repeatedly.
### Decision
The objective's description of Phase 3.2 ("extract shared layout: container, header, close button, scroll behaviour, enter/exit animation") is already done — that IS `DetailPanel.tsx`. What remains is extracting the **repeated inline style constants** into shared style objects that all 6 detail components can import. This is a style de-duplication, not a structural extraction.
Extract to `src/components/detail/detail-styles.ts`:
1.`detailRootStyle` — root flex column container
2.`sectionHeadingStyle` — the uppercase section header (replaces ~15 inline definitions)
3.`bulletListStyle` — standard list container
4.`listItemStyle` — standard list item text
5.`paragraphStyle` — standard body paragraph
Then update all 6 detail components to use these shared styles.
Delegating to Refactor Planner via work.start to produce the detailed plan.
## 2026-02-17 — Iteration 19: Planning Phase 3.2
### Analysis
Read all 6 detail components. Confirmed the structural shell (container, header, close, scroll, animation) already exists in `DetailPanel.tsx`. The 6 components are content-only renderers.
2.**Section heading h3** (uppercase, 12px, 600, secondary color): **16 occurrences** across 5 files (SkillDetail has one with `marginBottom: '10px'` variant)
3.**Bullet list container** (margin 0, paddingLeft 20px, flex column, gap 8px): **5 occurrences** across 4 files
4.**Body text / list item** (14px, 1.6 lineHeight, primary color): **5 occurrences** as `<li>`, **6 occurrences** as `<p>` with `margin: 0`
### Decision
Create `src/components/detail/detail-styles.ts` with 5 exports: `detailRootStyle`, `sectionHeadingStyle`, `bulletListStyle`, `bodyTextStyle`, `paragraphStyle`. Update 5 of 6 detail components (SkillsAllDetail excluded — no matching patterns). Estimated ~160 net lines saved.
Plan written to .ralph/plan.md. Emitting plan.ready.
## 2026-02-17 — Iteration 20: Build Phase 3.2
### Changes made
1. Created `src/components/detail/detail-styles.ts` (38 lines) — 5 shared CSSProperties constants:
- Task: Review large components for extraction opportunities
- Target components (by line count):
- ECGAnimation: 686 lines
- ChatWidget: 643 lines
- Sidebar: 572 lines
- BootSequence: 497 lines
- DashboardLayout: 492 lines
- CommandPalette: 455 lines
- LoginScreen: 449 lines
- Criteria: only extract where it genuinely reduces complexity, prioritise sections with own state/effects
- Delegating to Refactor Planner via work.start to analyse each component and identify extraction targets
## 2026-02-17 — Iteration 22: Planning Phase 3.3
### Analysis of 7 large components
#### ECGAnimation (687 lines)
- Zero React state (all refs) with a single monolithic useEffect running a canvas animation loop
- 5 pure helper functions defined outside the component (generateHeartbeatPoints, interpolateLetterY, getTextTotalWidth, layoutText, measureCharBaselineEdges) + 50 lines of letter/constant definitions
- The animation loop is deeply integrated — every canvas draw call depends on shared timing state
- **Verdict: SKIP extraction.** This is a highly cohesive canvas animation. The helper functions are already well-separated from the component. Splitting the animation loop into sub-functions would just scatter logic without reducing complexity — you'd need to pass the same ctx/timing/dimensions to every function.
- **Messages area (lines ~292-532, ~240 lines)** is a prime extraction target — it has its own scroll ref and rendering logic
- But: the messages area depends on `messages`, `isStreaming`, `inputValue`, `handleSubmit`, `onAction` from parent. Extracting means passing 6+ props, which is prop-drilling without meaningful encapsulation.
- **Verdict: SKIP.** The component's state is tightly coupled to its rendering. Moving JSX to a sub-component doesn't reduce cognitive complexity — it just moves it.
#### Sidebar (573 lines)
- Already has 3 extracted internal sub-components (SectionTitle, TagPill, AlertFlag)
- 2 useState, 1 useEffect (media query)
- **Patient profile section (~234 lines)** is the largest block, but it's purely presentational with no own state/effects
- The 6 field rows could share a `ProfileField` component, but they vary enough (conditional formatting, inline styles) that a shared component would need multiple configuration props
- **Verdict: SKIP.** Already well-structured with extracted sub-components. Further extraction is aesthetic, not complexity-reducing.
-`buildTypedLines()` (83 lines) is a pure data transformation that runs once at module load — could move to a config module but it's already at module scope, not inside the component
-`renderLines()` (76 lines) depends on component state (typedCount, phase, cursorPos)
- Reduced motion fallback duplicates some line rendering logic
- **Verdict: SKIP.** The effects orchestrate a tightly-coupled typing animation sequence. buildTypedLines is already extracted to module scope. renderLines depends on component state.
#### DashboardLayout (493 lines)
- 5 useState, 3 useEffect
- **`LastConsultationSubsection` (191 lines, lines 44-235)** is already defined as a separate function inside the file with its own interface. It uses `useDetailPanel()` context and receives only `highlightedRoleId` as a prop.
- **Verdict: EXTRACT `LastConsultationSubsection` to its own file.** It's already a standalone component — moving to a separate file is trivial and reduces DashboardLayout from ~493 to ~302 lines. This is the clearest win: zero refactoring of the component itself, just a file split.
#### CommandPalette (456 lines)
- 3 useState, 5 useEffect
- Results rendering (~112 lines) depends heavily on parent state (query, selectedIndex, allResults, executeAction)
-`Kbd` sub-component (16 lines) at bottom is tiny and only used here
- **Verdict: SKIP.** Tightly coupled to search state. No self-contained sections with own state/effects.
#### LoginScreen (450 lines)
- 11 useState (!) but they're all part of one animation orchestration sequence
- 4 useEffect that form a timing chain
- Username/password fields are visually similar but differ in: typing source (text vs dots), cursor logic, active field tracking
- **Verdict: SKIP.** The 11 state variables look alarming but they're all part of a single coordinated animation. Extracting sub-components would require passing most of this state down, adding complexity.
### Decision
**Only one extraction is justified: `LastConsultationSubsection` → separate file.**
All other components are either:
1. Tightly coupled canvas/animation code where splitting adds prop-drilling without reducing complexity (ECG, Boot, Login)
2. Already well-structured with internal sub-components (Sidebar)
3. State-heavy UI where sub-components would need 5+ props passed from parent (ChatWidget, CommandPalette)
The objective says "only extract where it genuinely reduces complexity" — and for 6 of 7 components, extraction would be arbitrary line-count reduction that moves JSX around without improving readability or maintainability.
## 2026-02-17 — Iteration 23: Build Phase 3.3
### Changes made
1. Created `src/components/LastConsultationCard.tsx` (204 lines)
- Moved `LastConsultationSubsection` from DashboardLayout.tsx
- Renamed to `LastConsultationCard` (component name matches file)
- Moved exclusive imports: `ChevronRight`, `CardHeader`, `hexToRgba`, `DEFAULT_ORG_COLOR`
- Uses `useDetailPanel()` context and `timelineConsultations` data directly
{"id":"task-1771291778-077f","title":"Phase 1.1: Migrate medications.ts prescribingHistory into skills.ts, then delete medications.ts","description":"Merge prescribingHistory arrays from src/data/medications.ts into corresponding entries in src/data/skills.ts. Update SkillMedication type in src/types/pmr.ts. Delete medications.ts. Verify build passes.","status":"closed","priority":1,"blocked_by":[],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-012659","created":"2026-02-17T01:29:38.329600962+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T01:32:23.180282710+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771292321-e764","title":"Phase 1.3: Split profile-content.ts into focused concerns — extract LLM prompt, evaluate education/achievements placement","description":"After 1.2 completion, profile-content.ts is 246 lines. Extract LLM systemPrompt to llm.ts or dedicated file. Evaluate whether education entries and achievements should move. Keep profile-content.ts for genuinely unique UI copy only.","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":[],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-012659","created":"2026-02-17T01:38:41.911205927+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T01:43:00.417343336+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771293556-ad30","title":"Phase 3.1: Extract shared ExpandableCard component from WorkExperienceSubsection, TimelineInterventionsSubsection, RepeatMedicationsSubsection","description":"Extract common expand/collapse card pattern into ExpandableCard.tsx, reducing duplication across 3 subsection components","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":[],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-012659","created":"2026-02-17T01:59:16.961841961+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T02:03:38.625048871+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297441-47cc","title":"Phase 0: Disable boot/login for faster iteration","description":"Change useState Phase boot to pmr in App.tsx, verify build passes","status":"closed","priority":1,"blocked_by":[],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:01.214989484+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:04:54.765481391+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297447-322f","title":"Phase 1: Merge secondary reference documents","description":"Read both career knowledge files, create deduplicated merged reference","status":"closed","priority":1,"blocked_by":["task-1771297441-47cc"],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:07.471600890+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:10:00.164257071+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297457-6530","title":"Phase 2.1: Audit patient.ts","description":"Verify personal details against references","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":["task-1771297447-322f"],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:17.484658038+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:11:52.179397274+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297457-bf43","title":"Phase 2.2: Audit timeline.ts","description":"Verify career narratives - largest content file","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":["task-1771297447-322f"],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:17.573252787+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:14:45.242936609+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297457-08ae","title":"Phase 2.3: Audit kpis.ts","description":"Verify metrics match CV exactly","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":["task-1771297447-322f"],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:17.657583328+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:15:49.725948312+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297457-a81d","title":"Phase 2.5: Audit skills.ts","description":"Verify skill descriptions and prescribing history","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":["task-1771297447-322f"],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:17.829470269+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:18:08.842924200+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297457-fca2","title":"Phase 2.6: Audit documents.ts and educationExtras.ts","description":"Verify education credentials","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":["task-1771297447-322f"],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:17.916644096+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:18:57.012788559+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297458-0e6b","title":"Phase 2.7: Audit profile-content.ts","description":"Verify UI copy and narrative text","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":["task-1771297447-322f"],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:18.003692252+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:20:28.780848146+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297458-622d","title":"Phase 2.8: Audit llm-prompt.ts","description":"Verify system prompt reflects accurate profile","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":["task-1771297447-322f"],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:18.090674714+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:21:47.621712296+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297458-4f63","title":"Phase 2.11: Final sweep for hardcoded strings","description":"Check components for remaining hardcoded text","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":[],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:18.348005503+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:23:38.024405947+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297465-54bf","title":"Phase 3.1: Remove ECG phase entirely","description":"Delete ECGAnimation.tsx, remove from App.tsx, remove ecg from Phase type","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":[],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:25.283840612+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:26:22.910370425+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297465-10bf","title":"Phase 3.3: Re-enable and verify boot sequence","description":"Change back to boot phase, verify full flow, build passes","status":"closed","priority":2,"blocked_by":[],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:25.463040291+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:28:45.201117879+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297465-763c","title":"Phase 4.1: Compile unverified content summary","description":"Ensure References/unverified-content.md is complete","status":"closed","priority":3,"blocked_by":[],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:25.554560166+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:29:17.618361543+00:00"}
{"id":"task-1771297465-c9be","title":"Phase 4.2: Final quality gates","description":"lint + typecheck + build all pass, boot sequence works","status":"closed","priority":3,"blocked_by":[],"loop_id":"primary-20260217-030331","created":"2026-02-17T03:04:25.641472037+00:00","closed":"2026-02-17T03:29:51.752918816+00:00"}
{"ts":"2026-02-17T03:03:31.331002246+00:00","iteration":0,"hat":"loop","topic":"task.start","triggered":"planner","payload":"# Task: Content Accuracy Audit & Boot Sequence Redesign\n\nAudit all user-facing text content on the portfolio website against authoritative reference documents. Replace hallucinated or inaccurate content with verified text. Redesign the boot sequence to remove the ECG phase and create a polished software-launch transition.\n\n## Reference Documents (Sources of Truth)\n\n**Primary (highest authority — written and reviewed by Andy):**\n- `References/CV_v4.md`\n\n**Secondary (comprehensive but compiled b... [truncated, 8616 chars total]"}
{"payload":"Phase 0 complete: boot sequence bypassed for dev, build passes","topic":"task.done","ts":"2026-02-17T03:05:03.537605525+00:00"}
"prompt": "# Task: Comprehensive Codebase Refactor & Simplification\n\nRefactor the portfolio codebase to elimin..."
"pid": 1801078,
"started": "2026-02-17T03:03:31.323822114Z",
"prompt": "# Task: Content Accuracy Audit & Boot Sequence Redesign\n\nAudit all user-facing text content on the ..."
}
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
